Blog / The Business Perspective

Measure EE is Not the Answer

I’ve come to know the L.A. Area Chamber as an organization with a deep legacy, grounded in a value system that demonstrates our care of community. Those values are reflected in our commitment to investing in public education, dating back to our beginning. 

The Chamber is a founder of L.A. Trade Tech and with LAUSD, we’ve supported more than $20 billion in facility bonds, raised more than $10 million and contributed thousands of volunteer hours for L.A.’s Cash for College programs.  We strive to ensure a quality public education for L.A.’s youth. We will never waiver, it’s in our DNA.

This past month, we took a position to oppose Measure EE, LAUSD’s per square foot parcel tax, set for the June ballot.

We understand the financial picture at LAUSD and the importance of committing resources to provide a quality education for all our students; however, Measure EE is not the answer.  This ballot measure is excessive and based on square footage, unfairly disadvantages multi-family and commercial properties. Measure EE will place a significant tax burden on property owners and renters, who are already facing an affordability crisis. Additionally, LAUSD has no plan for reform or budget planning to ensure long term sustainability, nor a requirement for independent oversight.  We are committed to helping develop a plan to increase investment in our schools, but this parcel tax is not the solution.

In our early meetings with LAUSD leadership, we were presented with multiple funding options, including a flat per parcel tax. In a special meeting of our Executive Committee, we agreed to support a flat rate scenario, which I communicated to the LAUSD Board (Read my statement here). Unfortunately, the LAUSD Board approved the 16 cents per square foot parcel tax without giving consideration to our suggestions or getting community input. 

Moreover, the L.A. Area Chamber has a long-standing track record in advancing good governance, including our advocacy of moving local elections to larger turnout dates because we believe more voters is better for democracy. The move to place this measure on a special election ballot in June will cost taxpayer’s $12 million and requires two-thirds of the votes to pass which is hard to achieve, even with a broad-based coalition. 

While we understand both the need for resources and the urgency of this situation, we believe this ballot measure is not the right solution. We are a Chamber that does right by L.A.’s youth, working relentlessly to seek opportunities for a better tomorrow.  We remain committed to the educational success of L.A.’s youth. 


Este artículo también está disponible en español.

This article is also available in Spanish.


Leave a Comment

Comments submitted are subject to review by the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce prior to posting. The Chamber reserves the right to monitor and withhold comments that include personal, offensive, potentially libelous or copyright protected language, materials or links. Only comments relevant to the topic will be posted. Comments posted must have a valid email address. View our full terms & conditions.

thanks for sharing this information.
Posted by: jhon @ 3:50:00 am

Private comment posted @ 6:21:42 am

LMAO ! What ever happened to the CA. Lottery helping our schools ???
History keeps repeating itself ! VOTE NO on measure EE !!!!
Posted by: Webmaster @ 2:00:20 pm

The students will NOT see a dime of this additional funding. The sole purpose... massive money grab for pensions The generous teacher pension and health care system is critically underfunded. The teacher union wants you to pay... the kids will see nothing.
Posted by: John Taxpayer @ 4:38:22 pm

Where can we go to vote on this?
Posted by: Joe @ 10:31:07 am

We are already taxed to death, California has a huge budget surplus, and property tax revenues are record breaking. Stop the wasteful spending and inefficiency and fantasy endeavors. No More Taxes! Vote NO
Posted by: Steve Bridges @ 9:43:21 am

Every voting opportunity has some bill for the children and the pitch is always the same...they need smaller class sizes, more supplies, better teachers, etc. each time each passes and each voting year a new proposition with the same sales pitch. Obviously these people have no business running the schools if they get what they ask for and complaint for the same thing the next year. How about taxing directly the parents that have the kids equally since not all homeowners have children and some renters have a pass in rent controlled areas. We should not be building more homes and apartments bringing in more families and children if we can?t provide adequate services for those who we have now.
Posted by: Danielle @ 11:44:10 pm

Teachers making $125,000 and complain about not making enough money should be ashamed.
Posted by: Emily @ 10:38:50 am

NO on EE. The LAUSD should not agree to contracts they cant afford and expect the private citizens to cover their costs. Future generations will have to cover government's continuous lack of responsibility.
Posted by: Emily @ 10:36:35 am

It is clear that the system today favors wealthy boroughs. It is not that "There are not enough resources", it is that they're ill administered. The public system remains a system that rewards the elite. Contrary to the precept of a public system! This measure changes nothing.
Posted by: Alex @ 5:35:13 pm

This is not the answer la county had other resources to get money out of it like privatize city service imagine how much money the city will save doing this but guess what it will never happen thanks to all city council, mayor and governor hungry for power and money
Posted by: Webmaster @ 5:18:24 pm

Scott Petri

I hope you're joking. How many handouts will satisfy?
Posted by: Carlos @ 11:16:29 pm

money grabbing unions
Posted by: armin @ 7:56:39 am

Thank you for opposing this excessive tax.
Posted by: Webmaster @ 3:53:24 pm

How about spend responsibly. How about live within your means!
Are you a property owner..? Are you a real estate investor.? Guess who ends up paying for this..? My tenants. because I will just raise the rent once again to pay for this. I don?t get a bigger paycheck because I need more money. I have to live within my means. So shall the county and the state. Stop with the everything free attitude! Someone has to pay for it all.
Posted by: Manny @ 5:36:20 pm

As an LAUSD teacher, I am deeply disappointed in the LAA Chamber's decision to spend $4M of their membership dues lobbying against Measure EE. At a time of large corporate profits and generous tax breaks, the Los Angeles business community looks like it does not want to pay its fair share. Corporate LA seems content with our state's 41st ranking in per pupil spending. Measure EE could add $500M per year in badly needed school funding. About 4 in 5 L.A. Unified students are minorities from low-income families. They need more help, not less, to be able to attend and graduate from college. Simply put, you are putting your clients' profits ahead of the needs of Los Angeles' most vulnerable children. You are on the wrong side of history. The optics look bad. I hope that you are soundly defeated in June. Meanwhile LAUSD's Superintendent and Board of Education members should publicly condem you for this action. LAUSD parents should make sure NOT to do any business with your members. Our students deserve better from our business leaders.
Posted by: Scott Petri @ 1:44:53 pm