Blog / The Business Perspective

It’s Time to Take Action on Public Employee Pensions

It’s Time to Take Action on Public Employee Pensions

Last week's Wall Street Journal opinion piece by former Mayor Richard Riordan and Alexander Rubalcava stirred up a hornet's nest. Their sharp criticism of Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and the City Council regarding the public pension crisis was quickly followed by City Hall's strong rebuke of the financial assumptions and a listing of actions currently underway. The din created by this debate about numbers should not drown out the serious discussion our City must have about the future of our public pension system.

Since the fall of the stock market in 2008 and early 2009, it has become clear that our City's pension obligations cannot be sustained with a business-as-usual approach. Our civilian and public safety pension systems are massively underfunded, and if left alone, will annually require a significantly larger slice of the City's general fund and an eventual call for higher taxes.

Elected officials in California and across the nation have been reluctant to address the growing public employee pension obligations head-on. They have either refused to acknowledge the problem's severity, or have been unwilling to challenge the politically powerful public employee unions who have vowed to protect collective bargaining victories won when the economy was better and more tax revenue was flowing into government coffers. For the most part, taxpayers are just now beginning to realize that a crisis exists as they watch services they care about being cut — in part to fund pension and health care obligations for retirees.

So, where do we go from here? First, the City's administrative staff and elected officials should sit down immediately with the collective bargaining units to discuss pension changes that could be implemented in time to make a difference in the 2010-11 budget.

Secondly, the Mayor and City Council should create a pension reform task force based on the successful model used in San Diego. The mission is simple: to develop thoughtful and meaningful recommendations for long-term, structural changes that will keep our public pension system solvent without diverting money from every other City department budget or asking taxpayers to contribute more money each year.

Like San Diego's model, the task force should include individuals who have experience with finance and pensions, taxpayer advocates, and representatives of both current and retired City employees. It should operate publically with maximum transparency and accountability and develop a set of recommendations in time for the Mayor's 2011-12 budget proposal.

The crisis we face must be a call to action for reasonable people to sit down and find a lasting solution. It requires residents, labor, business and City officials to pledge a commitment to work together toward of the goal of long-term fiscal stability for the City of Los Angeles.

Los Angeles and California deserve bold and creative leadership in solving the public employee pension crisis. It's up to all of us to make sure we deliver.

And that's The Business Perspective.

 

Comments

Leave a Comment

Comments submitted are subject to review by the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce prior to posting. The Chamber reserves the right to monitor and withhold comments that include personal, offensive, potentially libelous or copyright protected language, materials or links. Only comments relevant to the topic will be posted. Comments posted must have a valid email address. View our full terms & conditions.


Hi Gary,
Your piece is brilliant, but I think it doesn't go far enough. There is one thing that needs to be done that no one has talked about. Whenever a turnaround specialist is called into a sick company, the first thing that is done is a study to determine how the company got into so much trouble. While salaries and benefits are probably the single largest cause of Los Angeles' problems, I cannot but think there is more than that in play and spending too much money is a simplistic answer, not that you have ever said that, other have said that to me. I think there should be two Blue Ribbon Committees, the one you recommend and another to review all other aspects of the problems we face. I would also remind you of the two ballot propositions around 1982 that dealt with changing public safety pension plans. One proposition was defeated at the polls and the other was defeated by the state Supreme Court.
Finally the business community must set aside their special interests.
Posted by: Harold L. Katz @ 6:03:00 pm