Blog / The Business Perspective

Environment and Justice for All

There was a seven hour trash stink at L.A. City Hall yesterday as businesses from across the City expressed their anger about a proposal that would give the City the power to select the trash hauler for every business in Los Angeles and set the rates as well.

For the first time in the history of Los Angeles, the City is moving forward with a proposal that will set waste hauling rates for all privately held multi-family and commercial businesses by moving from an open market system to an exclusive franchise selected by the City. Specifically, the Los Angeles Board of Public Works is recommending that the City establish an exclusive franchise for each of the 11 yet to be established waste hauling districts. The proposal will create a costly and contentious bureaucracy for businesses and put the squeeze on small, family-owned waste hauling companies, many of whom have served Los Angeles for generations.

Supporters cite environmental and public safety reasons why the City must adopt an exclusive franchise system. What they fail to acknowledge is that the City can achieve the same environmental and safety standards through a non-exclusive franchise arrangement, whereby haulers who meet certain pre-determined standards are allowed to haul in the City.

An economic analysis by AECOM reveals why business owners were so upset yesterday and why everyone at City Hall should take another look at the serious financial ramifications of this proposal. Cities in L.A. County with exclusive franchise agreements have rates that are 33 percent higher than non-exclusive franchise areas, according to the report. More than 85,000 businesses would be impacted as well as 1.7 million people who live in rental units. 

It doesn’t have to be this way. There is no non-political reason why the City cannot achieve zero waste goals, fair wages and worker safety protections in a non-exclusive franchise. It is as simple as writing a binding agreement stating standards by which haulers must abide in order to do business in the City. If you don’t meet the standards, you don’t haul in the City of Los Angeles. If you violate those standards, you lose your contract.

But this fair and straight forward approach would not give the City the power to pick the exclusive franchisee or to set the rates. I suggest that every business in Los Angeles raise its voice on this issue by contacting your City Councilmember and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa. It stinks and your product or service could be next.

And that's The Business Perspective.

Comments

Leave a Comment

Comments submitted are subject to review by the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce prior to posting. The Chamber reserves the right to monitor and withhold comments that include personal, offensive, potentially libelous or copyright protected language, materials or links. Only comments relevant to the topic will be posted. Comments posted must have a valid email address. View our full terms & conditions.


Thank you for the article. We were able to negotiate a 43% reduction in the rate for our townhome complex. Under this plan we would be at the mercy of the overpriced, large haulers!
Posted by: Jim Toomey @ 12:30:00 pm

Gary- The control and lack of choice and putting small businesses out of business just is not right!I am tired of the City, State, & Federal Government trying to make alterations that will put small businesses "Out of Business". What happened to the talk of creating jobs and keeping small businesses going??? They say one thing, but try and do the opposite. Pepperdine University's Business Study mentions Small Businesses feel unsupported FROM THE ECONOMIC STIMULUS MEASURES set by our Government. We as small businesses are PROVIDED LIMITED ACCESS TO CAPITAL and are what keep our communities working.Limiting choice is not American!!!
Posted by: Peggy Nairn @ 4:49:00 pm

Private comment posted @ 4:45:34 pm

Gary - Unless there have been incidences of fisticuffs between drivers from different haulers, I don't see how single fixed price haulers for an area can be in the interests of public safety. And please tell me how City defined and mandated monopolies can enhance environmental protection. I can clearly see how the monopolies can erode service and result in a lack of competition, with the accompanying price increases and I agree, it does stink. One of the major benefits that I can imagine for Councilmembers, is some bigtime gift giving and election support from haulers that want to service a particular region. The communist who gave us this idea should be run out of town by Friday.
Posted by: Robert L. Rodine @ 4:20:00 pm